Legal Opinion
Hyde Park Co. v. Santa Fe City Council
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 29, 2000No. 99-2079, 99-2084PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
The narrow issue we must decide in this case is whether Plaintiff Hyde Park Company was entitled as a matter of federal constitutional law to approval of a proposed subdivision plat for land within the City of Santa Fe, New Mexico, where Hyde Park’s proposed plat to Defendant Santa Fe City Council met all enumerated requirements for plat approval.
I
Plaintiff Hyde Park Company owns certain real property within the City of Santa Fe. In September 1994, Hyde Park applied to the City for approval of a proposed residential subdivision plat. When, over two years later and after…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitchell v. City of MooreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Jacobs, Visconsi & Jacobs, Co. v. City of LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Dorothy Jeffries v. Turkey Run Consolidated School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Koch v. City of Del CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Crown Point I, LLC v. Intermountain Rural Electric Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Toni Ball v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Teigen v. RenfrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- County of Santa Fe v. Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.