Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Lehi City

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 6, 2012No. 20100420-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

T1 William A. Doyle appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Lehi City, Daniel Harrison, Blythe Bray, and Amanda Len Mackintosh (collectively, Appellees). Doyle claims that the district court erred in striking portions of affidavits he submitted in opposition to Appellees' motion for summary judgment, in concluding that Harrison and Bray were entitled to qualified fimmunity, and in determining that his notice of claim was inadequate, thereby barring his defamation and breach of contract causes of action. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

T2 Lehi City, through…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crossgrove v. Stan Checketts Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  2. HP Investments v. iLux Capital ManagementCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  3. Dao Trang Phap Hoa v. Vietnamese Unified Buddhist Ass'n of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  4. State v. HararahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  5. Crossgrove v. Stan Checkets Properties, LLC.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API