Legal Opinion

State v. Cuthrell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1980No. 8015SC652PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant first assigns error to the admission into evidence of the cocaine and marijuana identified at trial. Defendant contends that with respect to these exhibits there was not a sufficient showing of a chain of custody. This contention is without merit. The officers who handled the drugs positively identified the exhibits and accounted for every link in the chain of possession. State v. Olsen, 25 N.C. App. 451, 453, 213 S.E. 2d 372, 374 (1975); cert. denied, 287 N.C. 468, 215 S.E. 2d *197628 (1975). The State’s evidence established a clear chain of identity between the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DietzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. O'KEEFESupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SandersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. PoplinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API