Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 27, 1973No. 7321SC733PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BALEY, Judge.

The principal contention of the defendant is that the State has failed to connect the heroin which was identified at the trial *312by the State chemist with the white powder purchased from him by the undercover agent, Douglas, and that its admission into evidence is error.

Before any articles are admitted into evidence, they must be properly identified. State v. Winford, 279 N.C. 58, 181 S.E. 2d 423 (penknife); State v. Eagle, 233 N.C. 218, 63 S.E. 2d 170 (bottle of whiskey). “To justify their admission, a proper foundation must be laid, and such articles must be identified as the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WinfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. EagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CuthrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API