Legal Opinion

Haufler v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 9, 1977PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

In this eminent domain case we conclude that the Commonwealth is not now entitled to appellate review of a Superior Court judge’s ruling which excluded certain evidence in a trial before him without jury and that, in the normal course, a party to such a proceeding must wait until after the jury trial which has been requested pursuant to G. L. c. 79, § 22, as appearing in St. 1973, c. 983, § 1, before appellate review may be obtained. Because the procedural question is one of first impression, we exercise our discretion in this instance not to dismiss the appeal. We consider the admissibility…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Orasz v. Colonial Tavern, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. School Committee of Agawam v. AGAWAM EDUCATION ASS'NMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Iris v. Town of HinghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Fusco v. the Springfield Republican Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Donovan v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. D'Annolfo v. Stoneham Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. First National Bank v. HauflerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. McSorley v. Town of HancockMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  4. Roach v. Newton Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Bank of Boston v. HauflerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API