Legal Opinion

Roach v. Newton Redevelopment Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 15, 1980PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraucher, J.

Pursuant to G. L. c. 79, § 22, this eminent domain case was tried twice in the Superior Court, first before a judge without a jury (the first judge) and second before a judge and a jury. The dominant issue at both trials was whether there was a reasonable probability at the times of the takings that the land would soon be rezoned from single family residential use to commercial or business use. The first judge admitted evidence that after the takings the defendant Authority had obtained such a zoning change. *136The second judge excluded such evidence, and instructed the jury not to consider any…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. D'Annolfo v. Stoneham Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. STATE, HIGHWAY COMM'R v. GorgaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  3. Turnpike Realty Co. v. Town of DedhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. Harrison v. Textron, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Henry v. Mansfield Beauty Academy, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mulhern v. RoachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Boston Edison Co. v. Board of Assessors of WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Boston Edison Co. v. Massachusetts Water Resources AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  4. Salem Country Club, Inc. v. Peabody Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  5. Douglas Environmental Associates, Inc. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API