Legal Opinion

State v. BROMILEY

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 19, 2009No. Docket: Pis-09-18PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] The State appeals from the order of the Superior Court (Piscataquis County, Anderson, J.) granting Charles E. Bromi-ley IV’s motion to suppress the evidence resulting from law enforcement contact with Bromiley while he was using his all terrain vehicle (ATV). The Superior Court granted the motion, holding that the then-effective version of 12 M.R.S. § 10353(2)(G) (2008), permitting stops of ATVs without suspicion of any violation of law, was violative of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. 1 As a result of this ruling, the State was unable to prosecute the charge of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alexandre v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  2. Bourgeois v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  3. State v. McKeenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The Bank of New York Mellon v. Danielle ShoneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  2. Bernard Quirion v. Bryan VeilleuxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API