Legal Opinion
State v. McKeen
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 11, 2009No. Docket: Aro-08-396PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Majority: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, ALEXANDER, and LEVY, JJ.
Dissent: SILVER, MEAD, and GORMAN, JJ.
CLIFFORD J.
[¶ 1] The State of Maine appeals from the order of the Superior Court (Aroostook County, Hunter, J.) granting Brent L. McKeen’s motion to suppress all of the evidence in the operating under the influence case brought against him. Because we agree with the State that the Superior Court erred when it determined that 12 M.R.S. § 10353(2)(G) (2008)1 violates the Fourth Amendment by authorizing game wardens to stop any all-terrain vehicle (ATV) and granted McKeen’s motion to suppress, we…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. BoyerMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. LaytonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- State v. SherburneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. FortuneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- State v. BROMILEYSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Maryland Attorney General Opinion 100OAG003, Maryland Attorney General Reports2015
- State v. McKeenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009