Legal Opinion
Bernard Quirion v. Bryan Veilleux
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 23, 2013No. Docket Som-12-375PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] Bernard Quirion and his spouse, Nancy Dulac, appeal from an order of the Superior Court (Somerset County, Mills, J.) holding that the law of Canada and Quebec will apply to the determination of damages for their claims of negligence and loss of consortium against Bryan Veilleux and 9048-9493 Quebec, Inc. d/b/a S.M. Transport. They contend that we should accept their interlocutory appeal, reach the merits, and hold that Maine law should govern determination of their damages. Because this interlocutory appeal is not subject to an exception to the final judgment rule, we dismiss the appeal.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- OFS FITEL, LLC v. Epstein, Becker and Green, PCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- John's Insulation, Inc. v. L. Addison & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Fiber Materials, Inc. v. SubiliaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Collins v. Trius, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Virginia G. Druhan v. American Mutual Life, Alvin McPherson Alabama Financial GroupCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Irving Oil Limited v. ACE INA InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Charles R. Maples v. Compass Harbor Village Condominium AssociationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022
- Carol Cutting v. Down East Orthopedic Associates, P.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
- Estate of Paul R. Galipeau v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Emily A. Bickford v. Matthew A. BradeenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.