Bourgeois v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] Plaintiff Richard Bourgeois appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Marden, J.) in favor of defendants, Great Northern Nekoosa Corporation (Great Northern) and Colwell Construction Company (Colwell). Bourgeois brought an action for negligent infliction of emotional distress, and the court ruled that the defendants had no legal duty to protect him. Bourgeois asks us to overturn our decision in Michaud v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp., 1998 ME 213, 715 A.2d 955, and find that the defendants owed him a duty of care as a rescuer. Alternatively,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Myrick v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Adams v. Buffalo Forge Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Cameron v. PepinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Shaw v. JendzejecSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Michaud v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. ReesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Charlton v. Town of OxfordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Alexandre v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- State v. RickettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Irish v. GimbelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.