Legal Opinion

Tulsa Fuel & Mfg. Co. v. Gilchrist Drilling Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 18, 1920No. 9709PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; N. E. McNeill, Judge. Action by the Gilchrist Drilling Company against the Tulsa Fuel & Manufacturing Company on drilling contract. Judgment for plaintiff,. and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtPitohford, J.

The plaintiff in error was defendant below, and the defendant in error was plaintiff below. Hereafter the parties will be referred to, respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.

The Lynna Oil Company was the owner of an oil lease, and the defendant was the owner of a gas lease on the west half of the southwest quarter of section thirty (30), township twenty-three (23) north, range fourteen (14) east. These leases had been purchased from the original owners, O. B. Goldrick, Ray Collins, and Donald P. Oak. The defendant’s purchase was prior to that of the oil lease by the Lynna Oil…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blasdel v. GowerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Rains v. WeilerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Incorporated Town of Sallisaw v. ChappelleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Kline v. HaffnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Welling v. American Roofing & Sheet Metal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Gladys Belle Oil Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Ray F. Fischer Co. v. Loeffler-Green Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  4. Wattie Wolfe Company v. Superior Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Lieberman v. Merring, Martin & Boise Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API