Brown v. C. T. Elliott
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. The facts, which involve the validity of an indictment under § 5440 Rev. Stat., are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
These appeals involve the action of the Circuit Court in dismissing petitions for writs of habeas corpus to discharge appellants from the custody of appellee, United States Marshal for the Northern District of California. Both appellants were held under a warrant of removal made by the District Court of that district upon an order of commitment made by a United States commissioner in proceedings for the removal of appellants to the District Court of Nebraska.
There was an indictment found against appellants in the District Court of the Omaha Division' of the District of Nebraska for the crime…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Hyde v. ShineSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Thomas William Mayo, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. RastelliDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- State v. DrinkardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. La FeraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.