Legal Opinion

State v. La Fera

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 19, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Waugh, A. J. S. C.

The five named defendants move to dismiss both counts of indictment No. 85. Each count charges a conspiracy. Count one charges a conspiracy contrary to N. J. 8. 2A:98-l(h) to prevent the due administration of the laws of New Jersey, namely N. J. 8. A. 58:14-22, which latter is a public bidding statute covering contracts to be let by the Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners, a body politic and corporate (see N. J. 8. A. 58:14-2). Count two charges a conspiracy contrary to N. J. 8. 2A:98-1(/) to obtain money by false pretenses from the Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners.

Sin…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Strassheim v. DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1911

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Buhl Foundation v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API