Amaral v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This matter came before the Supreme Court pursuant to an order issued directing the plaintiff, who is pro se, to appear and show cause why the issues raised in her appeal should not be summarily decided. In this case the plaintiff has appealed from two orders in the Superior Court, one denying her motion for a jury trial, the other granting defendant’s motion for a protective order.
After reviewing the memoranda submitted by the parties and after hearing the parties in oral argument this court concludes that cause has not been shown. The issues will be summarily decided at this time.
This…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Virgil Cochran v. Francis J. Birkel, Virginia Hager, Bettie Klontz, and Kathy Rubens, All IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Schutt v. Federal Land BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- In re Joseph T.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
- Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Snidow v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.