Legal Opinion

Begay v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 13, 1990No. 1 CA-CV 89-454PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Chief Judge.

This case raises the question of whether Arizona courts have jurisdiction to garnish wages payable to an Indian living and working on a reservation. In a special action, the Coconino County Superior Court upheld the justice court’s jurisdiction to issue two writs of garnishment against ap-pellee/garnishee Salt River Project. For the reasons explained below, we conclude there was no jurisdiction to issue the writs of garnishment. However, we uphold the justice court’s personal jurisdiction over defendant/appellant Tony Begay in the underlying action.

The facts and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tracy v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Gary C'hair and Rochelle C'hair v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial District, State of Wyoming, and John StroheckerWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  3. People ex rel. Becerra v. Huber, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. State v. Zaman (Tahirkhaili)Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. Tracy v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API