Klosterman v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
GRANT, Presiding Judge.
This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission award denying industrial responsibility for a newly torn ligament to a knee which had previously sustained an industrial injury. The parties dispute whether the industrial injury directly and naturally contributed to the tear. Because the uncontradicted medical evidence established this connection and because the reasonableness of the non-indus trial activity causing the new injury was not raised, we must set aside the award.
On August 27, 1984, the petitioner employee (claimant) injured his left knee at work.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pearce Development v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- O'Donnell v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Pearce Development v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Dutton v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- East v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kaibab Industries v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Lou Grubb Chevrolet, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- DKI Corp./Sylvan Pools v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Rural Metro Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- DKI Corp./Sylvan Pools v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.