Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Cheatham

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1906PublishedCited by 10 opinions

FROM ROBERTSON. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Robertson County. — B. D. Bell, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

The defendant in error brought this suit in the circuit court at Springfield against the defendants, the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company and Walton, Wilson, Rodes & Co., to recover damages for personal injuries.. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $500 against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, and a verdict in favor of Walton, Wilson, Rodes & Co. The Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company and H. L. W. Cheatham, the plaintiff below, appealed from the judgment of the circuit court, and have assigned errors in this court. The record discloses that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Casement v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Smith v. Milwaukee Builders' & Traders' ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Bibb's Adm'r v. N. & W. R. R.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1891
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MartinTennessee Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Odom v. Sanford & TreadwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Grant v. Louisville & Nashville Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Finley v. KeislingTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Grace v. Louisville N.R. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
  5. Nat. Optical Stores Co., Inc. v. BryantTennessee Supreme Court · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API