Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Gordon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1915No. 12982PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered March 29, 1915, in favor of the plaintiff, denying recovery of a claim against an insolvent corporation in receivership proceedings, after a hearing before the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Prior to July 1st, 1912, and while certain receivers, appointed by the Federal district court at the suit of Peabody, Houghteling & Company, had charge of and were operating the defendants’ property, the appellants sold to the Federal receivers six cars, at an agreed price of $48,800. The receivers paid $8,800 on the purchase price and executed and delivered to the appellants, under the direction of the court, equipment bonds of the face value of $35,000. At the same time, this proceeding had been begun and was pending in the state courts.

The right of the Federal court to appoint receivers…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
  2. United States Trust Co. v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Sparhawk v. YerkesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Sunflower Oil Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Dayton Hydraulic Co. v. FelsenthallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carter v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. H. D. Roosen Co. v. Pacific Radio Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Bernhardt v. HemphillColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Chapman v. First Nat. Bank of SeattleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1929
  5. Hyland v. City Garbage & Contracting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API