Legal Opinion

Carter v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 19, 1932No. 3 Div. 978PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, 3.

This appeal was taken by Carter, as receiver appointed by the Jefferson court, and Adams and Butts who were respondents in the original bill, and all were interested in the preservation of the mortuary fund. Carter, as receiver, appeared in this case as the representative of the Jefferson court, and to protect the interests of which he wag receiver. The interest they all had was only to protect the funds of the order, and none of them had a direct personal interest in the final decree. Their appeal was for the joint benefit of all those thus interested, and we think that their joint…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Broom v. DouglassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Toy Toy v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. de Graffenried v. BreitlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. State ex rel. Sullivan v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  5. Ex parte Elyton Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. McCulloch v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. National Ben. Life Ins. Co. v. Shaw-Walker Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. De Moville v. Merchants & Farmers BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Horn v. Dunn Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. M.C. v. Tallassee Rehabilitation, P.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2015

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API