Legal Opinion
Dinkeloo v. City of New Haven
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 12, 1988No. 12816PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
The defendant New Haven Coliseum Authority (hereinafter the Authority or the defendant) appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff architectural firm of Kevin Roche-John Dinkeloo and Associates (hereinafter Roche-Dinkeloo) after a jury trial. The defendant claims on appeal that the trial court erred in: (1) charging the jury with respect to the expert witnesses who testified at trial; (2) allowing the witness Carl Walker to testify; (3) directing a verdict for Roche-Dinkeloo on the breach of contract count in the Authority’s counterclaim; (4) instructing the jury on the elements of fraudulent…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Bertozzi v. McCarthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Holbrook v. CasazzaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Levesque v. D & M BUILDERS, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- West Haven Sound Development Corp. v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Texaco, Inc. v. GolartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. GalloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- O'Hara v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.