Legal Opinion

State v. Randolph

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 23, 1982No. 81-855PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This sentencing appeal raises the issue of whether, under some circumstances at least, a convicted criminal defendant may refuse probation and insist upon execution of a prison sentence. Defendant was convicted upon her guilty plea to a charge of unlawful sale of a Schedule IV controlled substance. The presumptive Guidelines sentence for such offense for a person with defendant’s criminal history score is 14 months with execution of the sentence stayed. On May 21, 1981, the trial court, after offering defendant an opportunity to recommend a sentence which she deemed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Cooper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Ahern v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Vezina v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. State v. CarmickleOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. State v. OttSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. EstepCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1992

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API