State v. Randolph
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
This sentencing appeal raises the issue of whether, under some circumstances at least, a convicted criminal defendant may refuse probation and insist upon execution of a prison sentence. Defendant was convicted upon her guilty plea to a charge of unlawful sale of a Schedule IV controlled substance. The presumptive Guidelines sentence for such offense for a person with defendant’s criminal history score is 14 months with execution of the sentence stayed. On May 21, 1981, the trial court, after offering defendant an opportunity to recommend a sentence which she deemed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Cooper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Ahern v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Vezina v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. CarmickleOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. OttSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. EstepCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.