Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 2, 1983No. C0-83-854PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This is a sentencing appeal.

Defendant, while employed as a secretary in a law office in New Ulm, forged and cashed a large number of checks in the amount of $39,596.27 over a 4-year period. After the forgeries were discovered, defendant was charged with eight counts of aggravated forgery, Minn.Stat. .§ 609.625, subd. 1 (1982), based on separate acts of forgery occurring on eight different dates in February, March and April of 1982 (checks totaling $2,608.35).

At the omnibus hearing defendant’s trial attorney moved for an order consolidating the eight counts of aggravated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. EatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. State v. VazquezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. GliddenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. State v. VaughnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. O'HAGANCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  4. State v. SotoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. State v. SherwoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API