Legal Opinion

McRee v. Russell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 9, 1938No. 8 Div. 862PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

This litigation concerns a contest of the' will of Dr. Thomas J. Russell. There were-verdict and judgment for proponent, and contestant has appealed.

There was much proof pro and con upon the issues of mental capacity and undue influence, and appellant prepared a bill of exceptions. But this bill of exceptions was admittedly not signed within the time required by law (Section 6433, Code of 1923), and appellee’s motion to strike (here duly interposed — section 6434, Code) is due to be sustained. Appellant, therefore, moves to establish the bill of exceptions under the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. KimbrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Beatty v. McMillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Ex Parte HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Ettore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Hughes v. Albertville Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McRee v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. American Life Ins. Co. v. CarltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Faust v. BakerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API