Engelman v. Amos
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
The motion of appellee Amos for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
A three-judge District Court has enjoined New Jersey-officials from enforcing a state regulation applicable to payments under the federally financed program for Aid to Families With Dependent Children, Title IV of the Social Security Act of 1935, 49 Stat. 627, as amended, 42 U. S. C. §§ 601-610:
The regulation in question, § 615 of the New Jersey Categorical Assistance Budget Manual, would deny AFDC benefits to the extent that a family’s “total available adjusted income,” calculated without deduction for the “income…
2Cited by46 opinions
- Jefferson v. HackneySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shea v. VialpandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sudomir v. McMahonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- INTERCONTINENTAL INDUSTRIES, INC., Petitioner, v. AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE and Securities and Exchange Commission, RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Darces v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.