Legal Opinion

Geneja v. Ritter

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 8, 1984No. Docket 69135PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal as of right from a bench trial decision and order denying that they had a prescriptive easement in a driveway encroachment because the plaintiffs’ predecessors in interest gave defendants "express permission” to use the driveway property.

Both defendants’ and plaintiffs’ property was originally owned by Arthur and Mabel Schuh macher. On August 1, 1950, the Schuhmachers sold the southern portion of their property to defendants, who continue to own the same. On August 3, 1954, the Schuhmachers sold the remaining northern portion of their property to Harvey and Viola Krause. On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hanlon v. Ten HoveMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Renwick v. NoggleMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Jackson v. DeemarMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Siegel v. Renkiewicz EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. De Hollander v. Holwerda GreenhousesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. West Bay Exploration Co. v. Amoco Production Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API