Patillo v. Allen-West Commission Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas. '
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
This is an action by the Allen-West Commission Company, the plaintiff below, a corporation, to recover of Smith, Patillo & Co., a partnership, a balance of an account current. This balance consists of three items — one of $1,025, due September 1, 1892; one of $1,198.75, due September 1, 1893; and one of $508, due September 1, 1894 — for commissions on cotton not shipped, at the rate of $1.25 per bale. At the trial below the jury allowed the first two items upon the ground that they were parts of a stated account between the parties, and disallowed the third item, which…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. WylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Scovill v. GlasnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Canadian Northern Ry. Co. v. SenskeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- Hagenauer v. Detroit Copper Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1912
- Racine Paper Goods Co. v. DittgenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1909
- Swift & Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.