Hontex Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
EATON, Judge:
This antidumping action is before the court following a third remand to the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or the “Department”). See Final Results of Determination Pursuant to Court Remand (Dep’t Commerce, Dec. 9, 2005) (“Final Results on Remand”). See generally Hontex Enter., Inc. v. United States, 29 CIT-, 387 F.Supp.2d 1353 (2005) (“Hontex III’). Jurisdiction is had pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c) (2000) and 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(a)(2)(B)(iii) (2000). For the reasons set forth below, the court affirms the “Conclusion” found in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Hontex Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Huaiyin Foreign Trade Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Hontex Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anderson v. United States Sec'y of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Anderson v. United States Sec'y of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Hontex Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006