Legal Opinion

United States v. Larson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 20, 2010No. 09-4172PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Paul Andrew Larson was convicted of manufacturing or attempting to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and possessing precursor chemicals with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(c). On appeal, Mr. Larson argues, inter alia, that his right to a speedy trial under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3174, and the Sixth Amendment was violated.

Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we REVERSE the district court’s denial of Mr. Larson’s motion to dismiss for violating the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Zedner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. United States v. Bruce Derek Spring AKA Bruce Derek WallsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Frank James Occhipinti, Jr., Austin Michael Suttles, Timothy James Spence, Tina Marie SwabCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. State v. OllivierWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  4. United States v. RushinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API