Legal Opinion

State v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided September 28, 2012No. 102,210PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

Recently, in State v. Bogguess, 293 Kan. 743, 268 P.3d 481 (2012), this court held that the lack of an objection during a bench trial that consisted solely of stipulated facts did not preclude appellate review of the pretrial denial of a defendant’s motion to suppress. We explained that “when the bench trial is conducted by the same judge who presided over the hearing on the motion to suppress, there is no reason to rehash the same arguments when no additional evidence has been presented.” Bogguess, 293 Kan. at 747.

This case raises the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. State v. NunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  4. State v. HoustonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. State v. GordonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Martin v. NaikSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. State v. MburuCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. GomezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  4. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  5. In re the Care & Treatment of RitchieCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API