Legal Opinion

In re the Care & Treatment of Ritchie

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 11, 2013No. 109,130PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.:

Randall J. Ritchie appeals his commitment for treatment as a sexually violent predator. He makes three claims: The court should not have admitted the testimony of a psychologist with a temporary license; there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that he is a sexually violent predator; and the 2011 amended Sexually Violent Predator Act is unconstitutional. We do not agree. We affirm his commitment.

There is a history of sexual assaults here.

In 1994, Ritchie agreed to plead guilty to one count of aggravated kidnapping, a violation of K.S.A. 21-3421. According to Rit-chie,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. State v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. State v. GordonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. State v. CooperwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  5. Fischer v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Care & Treatment of RitchieCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API