In re the Care & Treatment of Ritchie
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, J.:
Randall J. Ritchie appeals his commitment for treatment as a sexually violent predator. He makes three claims: The court should not have admitted the testimony of a psychologist with a temporary license; there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that he is a sexually violent predator; and the 2011 amended Sexually Violent Predator Act is unconstitutional. We do not agree. We affirm his commitment.
There is a history of sexual assaults here.
In 1994, Ritchie agreed to plead guilty to one count of aggravated kidnapping, a violation of K.S.A. 21-3421. According to Rit-chie,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- State v. CooperwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Fischer v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Care & Treatment of RitchieCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020