Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 15, 2024No. 124607PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 124,607 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. MILES LOREN MARTIN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The Double Jeopardy Clauses of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and section 10 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights prohibit a court from imposing multiple punishments under different statutes for the same conduct in the same proceeding when the Legislature did not intend multiple punishments. 2. When a defendant brings a double jeopardy challenge based on multiple punishments imposed in one case, courts conduct a two-part test…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
  2. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API