Border States Paving, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of Transportation
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Border States Paving Corporation, a North Dakota paving construction company, appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion for judgment notwithstanding thé verdict or, in the alternative, its motion for new trial after a jury verdict was returned in favor of the South Dakota Department of Transportation. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
[¶ 2.] On June 13, 1993, the South Dakota Department of Transportation (DOT) accepted a bid from Border States Paving, Inc. (Border States) on a contract for asphalt resurfacing of. a 12-mile portion of Highway 46 in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Alverson v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Bridge v. Karl's, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Schuldies v. MillarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. DeNoyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Veeder v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Reuben C. Setliff, III, M.D., P.C. v. StewartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Dinsmore v. Piper Jaffray, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. GehmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re the Conditional Use Permit Denied to MeierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.