State v. Gehm
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] In this case we must decide whether documents augmenting an alibi defense, and other evidence, all discovered after trial, merit granting a new trial. Papers defendant found in her possession after her convictions for multiple statutory rapes tended to prove that she was not present at one of the times charged. Nonetheless, the trial court denied her new trial motion and we affirm, concluding that because her late discovery of evidence was the result of her own lack of diligence, and'the new evidence fails to give her a conclusive alibi, the trial court’s ruling was…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Daniel P. Taglia and Robert J. McDonnellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- South Dakota v. Spotted HorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. TiboltCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. ShawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. MuhmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. BostonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Klutman v. Sioux Falls StormSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. CondonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.