Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Gray

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 13, 1995No. C7-94-2290PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

Appellant Thomas Gray argues that the district court erred in (1) relying on his murder conviction to grant summary judgment for his wife’s estate on the issue of whether he feloniously and intentionally killed her and (2) imposing a constructive trust for the benefit of his wife’s heirs on his interest in the properties he held in joint tenancy with her. We reverse the grant of summary judgment on the issue of whether Gray feloniously and intentionally killed his wife, reverse the imposition of a constructive trust, and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

Appellant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Gau v. HylandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Principal Life Insurance v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Bruce R. Nelson v. Sheryl Ramstad HvassCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  3. Bruce R. Nelson v. Sheryl Ramstad HvassCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  4. Gibson v. Trustees of the Minnesota State Basic Building Trades Fringe Benefits FundsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API