Legal Opinion

In Re Weiss

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 2003No. 00-BG-493PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WASHINGTON, Associate Judge:

The Board on Professional Responsibility (the “Board”) recommended that respondent, Randy A. Weiss, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years, with one year suspended in favor of probation for a period of two years or until his therapist concludes that therapy is no longer necessary, for illegally taking funds from his law firm. The suspension, does not require a showing of fitness. Weiss filed an exception to the Board’s Report and Recommendation arguing that a suspension for more than one year is too harsh a sanction in light of his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. In Re GilDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. In Re ApplerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. In re RasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. In Re BachDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. In Re BachDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. In Re WeissDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API