Legal Opinion
Betz v. Chena Hot Springs Group
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 1982No. 6057PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Chief Justice.
The Chena Hot Springs Group [CHS] owns and manages the Chena Hot Springs Resort. CHS is a limited partnership with three general partners, Mr. Betz, Mr. Kinn, and Mr. Cotting. Pursuant to procedures set out in the amended partnership agreement, Mr. Betz was voted out as a general partner on August 1, 1980. He now seeks to invalidate his forced retirement or to dissolve the partnership and apply a different valuation method in the buyout of his partnership interest. CHS seeks to uphold the retirement, to continue the business, and to enjoin Betz from communicating…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Klein v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Sandra J. Douglas, for Herself and as Representative of a Class v. Beneficial Finance Co. Of AnchorageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Wright v. VickaryousAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Whaley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
- Peerless Mills, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Third-Party v. Hertz, Warner & Co., a Partnership, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Exxon Corp. v. BurglinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Jacob v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Betz v. Chena Hot Springs GroupAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Wirum & Cash, Architects v. CashAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.