Legal Opinion
Sandra J. Douglas, for Herself and as Representative of a Class v. Beneficial Finance Co. Of Anchorage
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 7, 1972No. 71-1893PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
Douglas, the appellee, brought a class action in the District Court for the District of Alaska against seven Alaska Beneficial Finance Companies (collectively referred to as Beneficial), alleging that they had violated the Federal Truth-in-Lending Act (the Act), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1665, by failing to disclose as security interests certain confession of judgment clauses in their promissory notes. On April 20, 1971, the district court entered a preliminary injunction restraining Beneficial from collecting on the notes pending the outcome of the action. That injunction is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The Delaware and Hudson Railway Company v. United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Ring v. SpinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StanisicSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Lindahl King v. Saddleback Junior College DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Anita T. Owens v. Raymond L. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Shango v. JurichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Donovan v. BierwirthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co., a Corporation v. Itt Continental Baking Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Donovan v. BierwirthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.