Legal Opinion
Mark CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 9, 1984No. 83-1555PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Circuit Judge.
Clark appeals from a decision of the district court for the Western District of Oklahoma granting the defendant-appellee’s (Santa Fe) Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.
Clark, an American Indian, brought suit against Santa Fe alleging that the company had denied him his civil rights by violating 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and 42 U.S.C. § 2000e. Clark alleges, inter alia, that Santa Fe’s promotion practices discriminated against Native Americans because less-qualified white employees were promoted above him solely on the basis of race. .
In addition, Clark…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Patricia D. Rush v. McDonald Corporation, Sharon Funston, and William R. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Michael Pagano v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Beard v. Whitley County REMCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Walter McAlester v. United Air Lines, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Hooks v. Diamond Crystal Specialty Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.