Legal Opinion

Wilson v. United States Elevator Corp.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 1, 1998No. 2 CA-CV 97-0003PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEspinosa, J.

¶ 1 After Glenn Wilson’s wrist was caught in the doors of an elevator, he sued the manufacturer, appellee United States Elevator Corporation, for injuries. The trial court granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment, finding as a matter of law that it had no continuing duty to notify the owner of the elevator that an improved door closing mechanism had become available years after the elevator had been purchased and installed. On appeal, Wilson asserts error, contending: (1) appellee had a continuing, post-sale duty to notify known purchasers of safety improvements of which it subsequently…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Walton v. Avco Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. DoCanto v. Ametek, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Kozlowski v. John E. Smith's Sons Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Gregory v. Cincinnati Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Richard Stengel v. Medtronic IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Lisa Stilwell v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Southwest Pet Products, Inc. v. Koch Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2003
  4. AMTRUST BANK v. FossettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Wetherill v. BashamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API