Legal Opinion

State v. Ashley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 16, 2011No. C082767CR; A142661PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for attempted aggravated murder, burglary, assault, sexual abuse, theft, and unlawful use of a weapon, contending that the trial court erred in imposing a requirement that he pay the fees of his court-appointed lawyer without first making findings concerning his ability to pay. We conclude that defendant’s contention was not preserved, because he did not ask the trial court to make findings. We therefore decline to consider it.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the charged offenses. As part of his sentence, the sentencing court ordered defendant to pay…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. BucholzOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Pamplin v. VictoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. KanuchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Bacote v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CoverstoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. AshleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API