Legal Opinion

Barnum v. Jackson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1931No. 23389. Department TwoPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— This action was brought to recover damages for the destruction of an automobile. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which the court concluded that a recovery should be had. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $2,800, from which the defendant appeals.

The facts may be briefly stated. The accident out of which the litigation arose happened on a paved highway a short distance south of the city of Mount Vernon, in Skagit county. The respondent was proceeding north in a Cadillac sedan, which was practically new and had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bortle v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. George v. McManusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. State ex rel. Baeder v. BlakeWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cooper v. RunnelsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Moon v. BullockIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Morrison v. PerryUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Gustafson v. RajkovichArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Boyd v. SiboldWashington Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API