Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Sibold

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1941No. 28129PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

James Boyd, now deceased, in his lifetime instituted this action to recover damages from Vincent G. Sibold and wife and their minor son, Gene Sibold, for personal injuries and damages to an automobile, claimed to have been sustained by plaintiff as the result of a collision between a car driven by plaintiff and a car driven by Gene Sibold, being operated at the time as a family car, for the use and benefit of the community composed of Mr. and Mrs. Sibold. Plaintiff asked for general damages in the sum of twenty thousand dollars, which included $144.45 hospital bill, $500 for doctors’ bills…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bortle v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hicks v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Ingersoll v. GourleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Roundtree v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  5. Dyer v. Missouri State Life Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gray v. GoodsonWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Cooper v. RunnelsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Warner v. McCaughanWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Moon v. BullockIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Morrison v. PerryUtah Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API