Legal Opinion
Cooper v. Runnels
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1955No. 33338PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
Can a tort claim for damage to property be assigned?
Plaintiff’s complaint alleges:
“2. That between the 10th and 16th days of March, 1954, the Defendants were spray painting a large water tower and tank of the City of Toppenish, Washington, said Defendant Company having during all of said times exclusive control over all of said spray painting operations. That said spray painting operations were so negligently and carelessly conducted as to deposit paint on the hereinafter mentioned vehicle or vehicles.
“3. That by reason of said negligence and carelessness and as a proximate cause thereof,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of HudsonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Slauson v. Schwabacher Bros. & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
- Boyd v. SiboldWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Yamamoto v. Puget Sound Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Jordan v. WelchWashington Supreme Court · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Kane v. KlosWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Senear v. Daily Journal-AmericanWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Kommavongsa v. HaskellWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Gray v. GoodsonWashington Supreme Court · 1963
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.