Legal Opinion
Brice v. Haynes Investments, LLC.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 13, 2021No. 3:18-cv-01200Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KIMETRA BRICE, et al., Case No. 18-cv-01200-WHO 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS v. 9 10 HAYNES INVESTMENTS, LLC., et al., Defendants. 11 12 KIMETRA BRICE, et al., 13 Case No. 19-cv-01481-WHO Plaintiffs, Dkt. Nos. 178, 179, 181, 182, 183 14 v. 15 MIKE STINSON, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Defendants move for summary judgment and plaintiffs move for partial summary 20 judgment and to exclude two of defendants’ experts in this class action case involving defendants’ 21 alleged scheme to charge illegally high…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.