Legal Opinion

Willow Mountain Corp. v. Parker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 29, 1978No. 7729SC654PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERWIN, Judge.

Defendant presents three questions on this appeal. He first contends that Judges Grist and Hasty erred in permitting plaintiff to amend its complaint. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 15(a), gives trial courts extensive discretion in determining whether or not leave to amend will be granted after the time for amending as a matter of course has expired. Indeed, “leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.” G.S. 1A-1, Rule 15(a). The discretion of the trial court in allowing amendments is not reviewable absent a showing of abuse thereof. Forbes v. Pillmon, 18 N.C. App. 439, 197 S.E. 2d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wood-Hopkins Contracting Co. v. North Carolina State Ports AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Blackwell v. ButtsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Galligan v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Barefoot v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Forbes v. PillmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Mabrey v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Sampson-Bladen Oil Co., Inc. v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Tyson v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Watson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API