Legal Opinion

Watson v. Watson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1980No. 8024DC174PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Plaintiff’s first assignment of error is that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing defendant to amend his answer after the case was calendared for trial. N.C.G.S. 1A-1, Rule 15(a), allows amendments to be made after the action has been placed upon the trial calendar “only by leave of the court or by written consent of the adverse party; and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.” This rule has been liberally construed and the trial judge has been given broad discretion in granting such motions. Gladstein v. South Square Assoc., 39 N.C. App.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Sherrer v. SherrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Johnson v. MuelbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Babb v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. North River Insurance v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. McDevitt v. StacyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Miller v. B.H.B. Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Saintsing v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API