Forbes v. Pillmon
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Defendant urges as error the court’s allowing plaintiff to amend his complaint. He concedes that G.S. 1A-1, Rule 15, provided for broad discretion on the part of the court in allowing motions to; amend complaint after answer is filed. His basis for argument is that, even so, the court cannot allow plaintiff to *441amend Ms complaint to set up a wholly different cause of action. The original cause of action was grounded on contract.- - The amendment sought recovery on quantum meruit. There is a difference in the measure of damages in a claim on an express contract and a claim on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stout v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3Cited by1 opinion
- Willow Mountain Corp. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978