Legal Opinion
Peppers v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 25, 1988No. 88AP-192PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, P.J.
Plaintiff, Reuben Peppers, appeals from the judgment of the Ohio Court of Claims, which denied his claim for damages against the defendant, and raises the following assignment of error:
“The trial court abused its discretion in admitting hearsay evidence on a critical issue in this case and in relying on that hearsay evidence to find the facts against the plaintiff.”
Defendant raises the following cross-assignment of error:
“The trial court erred in determining that Hobart Dixon’s acts were within the scope of his employment.”
This case arose out of an incident that occurred at the Columbus…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Amstutz v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- James H. Ex Rel. Ohio Legal Rights Service v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
- Mastran v. UrichichOhio Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by19 opinions
- Murphy v. McCloudDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Michael Spano, Sr., Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees, and Bonnie LagiglioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Caruso v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Elliott v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Siegel v. Univ. of Cincinnati College of MedicineOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.