Legal Opinion

Mastran v. Urichich

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1988No. 87-616PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFain, J.

The issue in this case is whether, when a mistrial has been declared with respect to one of two co-defendants in a civil case, but not as to the second co-defendant, so that the jury is charged with determining only the liability of the second co-defendant, out-of-court statements made by the first co-defendant may be admitted in evidence as an exception to the hearsay rule, pursuant to Evid. R. 801(D) (2). We hold that they may not be so admitted.

I

Mastran argues that Nick remained as a party in the case after the declaration of mistrial with respect to him; therefore, Mastran contends, his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weis v. WeisOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Green v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Schmitt v. Doehler Die Casting Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Ferry v. CiceroCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Murphy v. McCloudDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Peppers v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. State v. ClaryOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Edge v. Fairview Hosp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Gentry v. CollinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API