Legal Opinion
Hygienic Fleeced Underwear Co. v. Way
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 10, 1905No. 6PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
DALLAS, Circuit Judge.
This case was decided below upon bill and cross-bill, the other pleadings, and the proofs. Each party charged the other with unfair competition in trade and with wrongfully using certain trade-marks or trade-names. These charges only are now to be dealt with. No question respecting either the validity or infringement of the patent hereafter mentioned is for present consideration. The appellant was complainant in the original bill. The decree appealed from dismissed that bill, and specifically ordered as follows:
“(2) That the said Hygienic Fleeced Underwear Company, its…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Bickmore Gall Cure Co. v. KarnsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
- Heide v. Wallace & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
3Cited by5 opinions
- Telechron, Inc. v. Telicon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Venetianaire Corp. Of America v. A & P Import Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Armour & Co. v. Louisville Provision Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1921
- Wise v. Bristol-Myers Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Rowley v. J. F. Rowley Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908